entering strongly into our theaters just over a year (although in the past there had been many attempts to launch), the 3D has unleashed a veritable wave of consensus among the public. This new technology was supposed to be used initially to provide depth to the images on the screen, it was a good example of the ' James Cameron's Avatar , until now the only real work that the system had really stereoscopic effect. For another slice of insiders, however, 3D has served only to amuse the public, causing him to get some object during the movie.
Seeing a film in this way is not easy. It also requires some cooperation from the viewer, who must wear goggles for the duration of the film. To say nothing of those who wear glasses already, had to get contact lenses or glasses on top of other glasses.
From some time now, those uncomfortable glasses seem to have taken the habit of wanting to be used unnecessarily, with films in which the use of 3D is simply an abuse, mainly designed to "inflate" the price of the ticket .
is becoming a fashion in fact to bring the film in 3D, even when it is not necessary. How many times during (or after) watching a film you've wondered " but because I'm wearing glasses? " . A problem that is becoming increasingly important, also saw the continued rise of cinemas equipped for this technology. Now that Fausto Brizzi is preparing the first Italian film in 3D (it will be titled "Sex 3D") is likely to be in really a future in which the 3D films meaningless increase dramatically forcing viewers to spend 10/15 € a ticket to go to the movies.
In short: Cameron goes well, pass well animated films occasionally, but please remember also that often for some of the 2D film can also be an advantage. This consideration obviously will have no impact, but some things are right to say every now and then, perhaps only out of my mind.
... Oh I forgot, sorry again William!
0 comments:
Post a Comment